Everything you need to know about religion in Queensland schools plus Orwellian AFP raids.
Queensland Parents for Secular State Schools
We last spoke to Alison on episode 104 on the 13th of July 2017.
Alison gave us a great explanation of the latest news and developments regarding religious instruction in Qld state schools?
What is involved in starting a petition and what effect do they have? How many signatures do you need to have an influence?
Join us for a beer
Join our Sunday drinks session.
59:08 Selective Schools
Gladys Berejiklian’s decision to establish a new selective school in Sydney’s south-west has set new precedents. Few people seem to support it, even fewer will benefit.
For premiers and anyone else who needs to be reminded, which students who walk in through the school gate each day really matters. Schools which select students end up with those who are more advantaged. Such schools accumulate the social, cultural and even financial capital of the students and their supportive and resourceful parents.
Schools which enrol an increasing proportion of disadvantaged students gradually lose the resource of higher-performers and role models … Apparently all by herself, Gladys Berejiklian has decided to turn an existing disadvantage for so many young people into an ongoing disaster.
A stark contrast’: the ethnic divides across Sydney’s schools.
Wealthy migrant and Anglo families are “self-segregating” when they choose schools, with migrants shunning private schools in favour of the selective system and Anglo families doing the opposite, a leading researcher says.
These decisions were indicative of a wider problem across Sydney, with many schools more ethnically divided than the suburbs in which they were located, said University of Technology social scientist Christina Ho.
In NSW, 83 per cent of students in fully selective schools came from language backgrounds other than English (LBOTE), while more than half of the 99 schools with fewer than 10 per cent LBOTE students were private and in wealthy areas.
The trend was concerning because schools had a vital role to play in developing inter-cultural understanding in the community, Dr Ho said. “The increasing diversity of our communities is not reflected in our education system.”
1:10:19 George Orwell’s prescient novel 1984 is turning 70 and only growing more relevant with age
The AFP raids.
News Corp political editor Annika Smethurst had her home raided by the AFP over a 2018 story about the possibility of the ultra-secretive Australian Signals Directorate gaining powers to monitor Australian citizens.
The ABC had their offices raided over a 2017 story on the alleged problematic behaviour of some Australian SAS soldiers in Afghanistan.
Both stories were based on leaked documents. Any difference to Julian Assange?
Prime Minister Scott Morrison’s initial reaction was arrogant. Asked if he was bothered by the look of police raiding journalists homes, he replied: “It never troubles me that our laws are being upheld”.
This government doesn’t give a rat’s about freedom.
What we really need is Freedom of the Press but we what we will get is Religious Privilege dressed up as Freedom of Religion.
In Orwell’s 1984 there were various ministries.
In Australia in 2019 we have the Ministry of Home Affairs, which concerns itself with home invasions.
There’s a weird confluence of history going on here. That’s because this week was not just the anniversary of Tiananmen Square. It was the anniversary of 1984.
The AFP raids are just the third leg of an Orwellian trifecta.
First, the contamination of truth and rewriting of history (Fox News, Sky News, Murdoch Press and PRC re Tiananmen square).
Second, the control of the working class by dampening their willingness or capacity to rebel (witness the return of a Morrison government promising tax cuts for the rich).
Third, it is the jackboot police service (The AFP raids).
A word he DIDN’T use – but which combines the two – is doublespeak.
Doublespeak is saying one thing and meaning another, usually its opposite. (think Jordan Peterson)
In 1984 when BIG BROTHER and the Party say PEACE they mean WAR, when they say LOVE they mean HATE, and when they say FREEDOM they mean SLAVERY.
When Scott Morrison says Religious Freedom, he means Religious Privilege.
When he says the economy is strong he means the economy is fucked.
Msieur Fist. Liability and litigation have weakened organisational abilities to achieve their purposes, having to cover their arses before being able to provide. As a lawyer, can you explain how this has gotten so out of hand? Surely, restricting the ability or freedoms of an individual in the name of liability and insurance concerns also limits the outcome of any endeavour on the part of that individual, and shapes the result accordingly. Is there any chance there could be a discussion on this sometime in the next few? I’d like to hear the views of the FistyGloveMan.